State v. Ben-Yisrayl’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2009
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Ring v. Arizona · Brady v. State · Ben-Yisrayl v. State · Ritchie v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“although improper, does not jeopardize the constitutionality of I.C. § 35-50-2-9 inasmuch as the statutory framework remains intact, and viable, in the absence of the offending subsection.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Barker“does not leave a complete and operative statute as required by Brady.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Barker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.