Stamper v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
February 2008
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Soberon v. United States · Jones v. Atchison · Tumulty v. State · 70 Cal. App. 3d 984 - People v. Elliott · Dowell v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“had failed miserably as defense counsel during the battery trial and there was no reason to believe he would have fared any better during the habitual proceeding.” Koehler, 499 N.E.2d at 199 . 6 . This view was expressed in Stamper v. State, 809 N.E.2d 352, 355 (Ind.Ct.App.2004) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Henley v. State“In the case at bar, we first note that there is no indication in the record that the trial court considered the Koehler factors. This alone supports reversal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Henley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.