Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 809 P.2d 255 - Moore v. Moore

Moore v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2018

10 state decisions

50199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bard Ranch Company v. Weber · Kane v. Kane · Moore v. Moore · Connors v. Connors · Kennedy v. Kennedy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The order of the district court is reversed, and the case is remanded to that court with directions that it should vacate the citation of contempt against the wife, and require an accounting by the parties of the property subject to division by the decree of divorce. Because of a real possibility in this case that the failure of the parties to comply with the terms of the decree relating to the division of property may have resulted in the frustration of an equitable division of the property of the parties, the trial court, in the exercise of its equitable powers, is free to conduct such additional proceedings as it deems necessary to effectuate the divorce decree in a reasonable and equitable manner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The issues as stated by appellant are: The trial Court erred in entering its Order Limiting The Scope of Accounting which provided: 1. The Court will only hear testimony and take evidence with regard to the conduct of the parties after the Decree of Divorce on September 15, 1989, and how such conduct has caused the Defendant to be deprived of property and thus not receive an equitable share of the marital estate. 2. The Court will not hear testimony or receive evidence as to any allegations regarding the property or debts existing prior to September 15, 1989.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[A]dditional proceedings, which are collateral to the issues presented in the appeal and which do not affect the issues on appeal or the outcome of the appeal, may be conducted in the district court even while the appeal is pending in this court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.