Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 809 P2D 261 - Moore v. Moore

Moore v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2021

22 state decisions

1001991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Wolff v. McDonnell · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · Chambers v. Mississippi · Fuentes v. Shevin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he guardian ad litem has the same ethical responsibilities in the proceeding as any other attorney,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * Guardians ad litem may not have ex parte communications with the judge.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “We are satisfied that those rules were applicable in this instance. A guardian ad litem is the attorney for the minor whom he is appointed to serve.... He participates in the proceedings as an advocate.... In Wyoming, that rule is consistent with policy articulated by the legislature in two specific statutes requiring, or permitting, the appointment of a guardian ad litem since, in each statute, the guardian is charged with representing the child.... In accordance with the foregoing authority, we perceive it to be unequivocal that the guardian ad HKtem has the same ethical responsibilities in the proceeding as any other attorney. The specific subject matter of this case is sue-cinetly summarized in this way: "* * * Guardians ad litem may not have ex parte communications with the judge." Podell, The Role of the Guardian Ad Litem, 25 Trial 31, 34 (April 1989).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.