WLAE, LLC v. Edwards’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Veazey v. City of Durham · In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 Peoples · Burgess Ex Rel. Burgess v. Gibbs · Harris v. Matthews · In re T.R.P.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Rule 12 of the Rules of Civil Procedure provides that whenever it appears by suggestion of the parties or otherwise that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter, the court shall dismiss the action. We review Rule 12(b)(1) motions to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction de novo and may consider matters outside the pleadings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. North v. McRae“Standing refers to 'a party's right to have a court decide the merits of a dispute.' To have standing to bring a claim, one must be a 'real party in interest,' which typically means the person or entity against whom the actions complained of were taken.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“If a party does not have standing to bring a claim, a court has no subject matter jurisdiction to hear the claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.