Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 809 So. 2d 1002 - State v. Mathews

809 So. 2d 1002 - State v. Mathews’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Giglio v. United States · Energy Cooperative, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Code of Criminal Procedure Article 706 prohibits the consolidation of separate indictments for trial without the consent of the affected defendants. Designating the act of consolidation as one of amending does not remove the joinder from the strictures of article 706. Although the comments to article 706 explain that the prosecution may avoid obtaining the consent of all of the defendants by charging them in a single bill of indictment, the single bill cannot be a subsequent bill that resulted from the mere consolidation of two prior separate bills of indictment. See La.Code Crim. P. art. 706, Official Revision Comment b.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.