809 So. 2d 1196 - State v. Dabney’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2006
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Tibbs v. Florida · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · State Ex Rel. Graffagnino v. King · Southern Railway Co. v. Seaboard Allied Milling Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to prove the intent or guilty knowledge necessary to demonstrate constructive possession [of the weapon][on either count].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dabney“had any intentions of leaving, it was surely not in that car.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dabney“mere acknowledgment of the gun being inside the car,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dabney
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.