Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 809 SO2D 69 - Richardson v. State

Richardson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2003
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gillman v. State · 467 So. 2d 447 - Frazier v. State · Allen v. State · State v. Gillman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While there are cases recognizing the vindictiveness challenges when the judge has been involved in the plea negotiations, this critical fact is not present in the record of this case. In the absence of judicial involvement in the plea negotiations, the burden was on [the defendant/appellant] to prove actual vindictiveness on the part of the sentencing judge, a burden he has not met.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.