809 So. 2d 761 - Howery v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2007
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McClain v. State · 440 So. 2d 297 - Groseclose v. State · 691 So. 2d 948 - Herring v. State · 373 So. 2d 1042 - Gandy v. State · 506 So. 2d 989 - Meshell v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he `testimony of a single uncorroborated witness is sufficient to sustain a conviction . . . even though there may be more than one person testifying to the contrary.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the jury is the judge of the weight and credibility of testimony and is free to accept or reject all or some of the testimony given by each witness.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.