Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

809 So. 2d 85

Kronfeld v. Kronfeld

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 27, 2002

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-02-27

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 2016

7 state decisions

Relies on Kronfeld v. Kronfeld

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-02-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the Order on Remand and the Second Amended Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage. The trial court properly gave “the husband credit for the money spent in paying off the corporate debt,” in keeping with this court’s mandate in Kronfeld v. Kronfeld, 761 So.2d 411, 412 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Contrary to the wife’s argument here, the trial court’s distribution properly awards each spouse 50% of the marital assets and then deducts the husband’s credit from the wife’s share.

¶2Affirmed.

/809/so2d/85 · .json · Public domain