Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 809 S.W.2d 540 - Gallardo v. State

Gallardo v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
September 2001
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 144th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Reading Co. v. Schweitzer · Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Ogilvie · Johnson v. Texas · Washington v. Harper · Williams v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Regardless of the plea and whether the punishment be assessed by the judge or the jury, evidence may, as permitted by the Rules of Evidence, be offered by the state and the defendant as to any matter the court deems relevant to sentencing, including the prior criminal record of the defendant, his general reputation and his character. The term pri- or criminal record means a final conviction in a court of record, or a probated or suspended sentence that has occurred prior to trial, or any final conviction material to the offense charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(a) Regardless of the plea and whether the punishment be assessed by the judge or the jury, evidence may, as permitted by the Rules of Evidence, be offered by the state and the defendant as to the prior criminal record of the defendant, his general reputation and his character. The term prior criminal record means a final conviction in a court of record, or a probated or suspended sentence that has occurred prior to trial, or any final conviction material to the offense charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “... simply puts before a jury assessing punishment in a felony case the same information presently available to juries in capital cases and to courts assessing punishment in other cases.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.