Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 81 A2D 86 - Hankin v. Spilker

Hankin v. Spilker’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 1953
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Spilker v. Hankin · Schaff v. R. W. Claxton, Inc. · Etty v. Federal Consulting Service, Inc. · Hankin v. Spilker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The argument is based upon the familiar rule that the allegations and proof must correspond. We agree that such is a fundamental of good pleading and practice and, as we said in Etty v. Federal Consulting Service, D. C.Mun.App., 59 A.2d 692, 693 , ‘we do not wish to be understood as approving a practice which would permit a party to allege one thing and prove another.’ But there we also said that under common law procedure and under the federal rules upon which Municipal Court rules were patterned, a variance between pleading and proof is not fatal unless it misleads the opposite party in maintaining his action or defense on the merits.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.