Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 81 A.3d 167 - Dubaskas v. Commonwealth

Dubaskas v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Raiford · Walker v. Eleby · Shovel Transfer & Storage, Inc. v. Simpson · Pennsylvania Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Commonwealth Department of General Services · Bethenergy Mines Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Environmental Protection

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Code defines ‘contract,’ in part, as an agreement for the procurement of ‘services,’ a term which ‘does not include employment agreements or collective bargaining agreements’ 62 Pa.C.S. § 103.... Because the Code explicitly and unambiguously excludes ‘employment agreements’ from what constitute ‘services’ under the Code, it follows that ‘employment agreements’ are not ‘services’ that can be the subject of a ‘contract’ that falls within the scope of the Board’s jurisdiction as outlined in Section 1724(a)(1).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.