Jordan v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1886
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 82 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently May 2008 · most notably Roan v. State (1932), Stokley v. State (1950)
2 federal appellate · 82 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Storey v. State · Oliver v. State · Tesney v. State · Jordan v. State · Armor v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“". . . When a particular intent or formed design is requisite to constitute an offense, knowledge of its existence, and a common purpose to perpetrate the offense, must be shown before a person can be convicted of aiding and abetting. We so held on the former appeal. Jordan v. The State, 79 Ala. 9 ; State v. Hildreth, 51 Amer.Dec. 369, and notes."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.