Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 81 ALA 577 - Parsons v. State

Parsons v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1886

Citation profile

177
cited by 177 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
20
states following
March 2020
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 154 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 177 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2020 · most notably Anderson v. State (1922), Clark v. Arizona (2006)

18 federal appellate · 154 state decisions — followed in 20 states

360188618901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Pike · Ford v. State · State v. Jones · Bradley v. State · Roberts v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 177 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * the inquiries to be submitted to the jury, then, in every criminal trial where the defense of insanity is interposed, are these: First. Was the defendant at the time of the commission of the alleged crime, as a matter of fact, afflicted with a disease of the mind, so as to be either idiotic, or otherwise insane ? Second. If such be the case, did he know right from wrong, as applied to the particular act in question ? If he did not have such knowledge, he is not legally responsible. Third. If he did have such knowledge, he may nevertheless not be legally responsible if the two following conditions concur: (1) If, by reason of the duress of such mental disease, he had so far lost the power to choose between the right and wrong, and to avoid doing the act in question, as that his free agency was at the time destroyed; (2) and if, at the same time, the alleged crime was so connected with such mental disease, in the relation of cause and effect, as to have been the product of it solely.’’”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.