81 Ark. App. 226 - Peterson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably 85 Ark. App. 347 - Richardson v. State (2004), 96 Ark. App. 256 - Haley v. State (2006)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Burley v. State · Johnson v. State · Roberts v. State · 76 Ark. App. 121 - Rudd v. State · Lawson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Intoxicated” means influenced or affected by the ingestion of alcohol, a controlled substance, any intoxicant, or any combination of alcohol, a controlled substance, or an intoxicant, to such a degree that the driver’s reactions, motor skills, and judgment are substantially altered and the driver, therefore, constitutes a clear and substantial danger 12of physical injury or death to himself and other motorists or pedestrians.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.