Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 81 Cal. App. 4th 868 - Dimock v. Emerald Properties LLC

81 Cal. App. 4th 868 - Dimock v. Emerald Properties LLC’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
4
states following
October 2021
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently October 2021 · most notably 202 Cal. App. 4th 89 - Lona v. Citibank, N.A. (2011), 214 Cal. App. 4th 780 - West v. JPMorgan Chase Bank (2013)

26 state decisions

490200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National Bank · Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Bentley · 15 Cal. App. 3d 112 - Karlsen v. American Savings & Loan Ass'n · Thompson v. Nelson · 51 Cal. App. 4th 1358 - Allan v. Snow Summit, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is based on the theory that one who is relying upon equity in overcoming a voidable sale must show that he is able to perform his obligations under the contract so that equity will not have been employed for an idle purpose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.