Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 81 F.1d 227 - Cory v. Penco

Cory v. Penco’s Empirical Analysis

81 F. 227 · 1897

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
June 1913
most recently cited

6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 1913

6 district ·

20189719001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Oregon · Orhanovich v. The Steam-Tug America · Penco v. Cory · Cory v. Penco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is sufficient prima facie proof for libelant to produce bills claimed to have been paid, and witnesses who testified that they had paid them, without further testimony.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.