Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

81 F.2d 1022

Docket No. 8101.

Tesciona v. Johnston

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 1936.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1936-03-27

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1936

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1936-03-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Frank Tesciona, in pro. per.

¶2H. H. McPike, U. S. Atty., and A. J. Zirpoli, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

¶3Before WILBUR, MATHEWS, and IIANEY, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Upon consideration oL the record and brief filed, and by direction of the court, ordered, order of District Court affirmed, that a decree be filed and entered accordingly; mandate to issue in thirty days.

/81/f2d/1022 · .json · Public domain