Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 81 F.2d 115 - Harrison v. Love

Harrison v. Love’s Empirical Analysis

81 F.2d 115 · 1936

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
October 1968
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently October 1968

13 federal appellate · 1 district ·

801936194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Missouri Kansas Texas Pailway Company v. Sallie C Wulf · Mecom v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Co. · Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Cox · New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Kinney · Young v. Masci

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * that she is interested in said estate; that said deceased departed this life on the 10th day of August, 1932 * * * that said deceased left an estate within said County of Berrien, Michigan, to be administered, and that the estimated value thereof is as follows: a cause of action for wrongful death, $50.00 and upwards, as she is informed and verily believes.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.