Prudential Ins. v. McKee’s Empirical Analysis
81 F.2d 508 · 1936
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 1966
7 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 112
Relies on Alexander v. Hillman · Camp v. Gress · St Louis Ry Co v. McBride · Commercial Casualty Ins Co v. Consolidated Stone Co · United States v. Hvoslef
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * the right to specially appear in the federal court is substantial, and * * * where no affirmative relief is asked, and the intention to appear specially is plain, inaptness or even incoherency in making this point clear will not constitute a waiver.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.