Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 81 F.3d 1077 - National Coal Ass'n v. Chater

National Coal Ass'n v. Chater’s Empirical Analysis

81 F.3d 1077 · 1996

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
March 2016
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Jove Engineering, Inc. v. Internal Revenue Service (1996), Midrash Sephardi, Inc. v. Town of Surfside (2004)

23 federal appellate · 4 district ·

240199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Bailey v. United States · Federal Deposit Insurance v. Meyer · Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc. · Ratzlaf et Ux United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “.... [Beginning in the base year, HHS] paid a predetermined amount per plan member per month, without regard to the amount of money that the [predecessor] plans actually spent for Medicare-covered services. .... [I]n the base year, the [predecessor] plans spent $156.8 million on Medicare Part B and related administrative expenses [and] received $182.3 million in risk-capitation payments for Medicare Part B services and related administrative costs, an amount that exceeded actual costs by $25.5 million.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`[r]eimburse' is defined as `to pay back (an equivalent for something taken, lost, or expended) to someone: repay.' Webster's Third New International Dictionary 1914 (1986). The ordinary meaning of the term `reimbursement' is not restricted by any requirement that such payments be dollar-for-dollar what the reimbursed party payed out.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in § 9704(b)(2) refers to the entire amount that HCFA paid the Plans under the capitation agreement, rather than the amount that the Plans actually incurred in Medicare-related expenses, the court stated that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.