81 F3d 150 Lindsey v. Evatt W Cci

81 F.3d 150

Roy Garey LINDSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Parker EVATT, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of
Corrections; W. Wallace, Warden, CCI; Joyce E. Brown,
Deputy Warden, CCI; Warren Koestner, Classification
Caseworker, CCI; Sergeant Foster, Warden, CCI; James
Harvey, Regional Administrator, HQ, SCDC; Earl Brown,
Deputy Warden, CCI; Aaron J. Kelly, Classification
Caseworker, CCI; Sammie Brown, Director of Classification,
HQ, SCDC; Aldean Henley, Classification Caseworker, PCI;
Matthew Ogunsile, Head Classification Official, PCI; C.L.
Brock, Deputy Warden, PCI; S.R. Witkowski, Warden, PCI;
D.F. Dease, Regional Administrator, Appalachian Regional
Office, SCDC, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7695.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 21, 1996.
Decided April 4, 1996.

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-291-0-21BD)

Roy Garey Lindsey, Appellant Pro Se. Raymon E. Lark, Jr., BELSER, LEWIS, ROGERS & LARK, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Advertisement
view counter
1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lindsey v. Evatt, No. CA-94-291-0-21BD (D.S.C. Sept. 26, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.