Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

81 F.3d 152

Docket No. 95-6950.

Webster v. Jones

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: March 21, 1996. Decided: April 2, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-04-02

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 2001

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States v. K McDaniel

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-04-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Leslie Anthony Webster, appellant pro se.

William Fain Rutherford, Jr., Elizabeth Kay Dillon, Kevin Scott Blair, Woods, Rogers, & Hazlegrove, Roanoke, Virginia, for appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Webster v. Jones, No. CA-94-490-R (W.D.Va. May 19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/81/f3d/152 · .json · Public domain