Cardinal v. Gorczyk’s Empirical Analysis
81 F.3d 18 · 1996
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2025
4 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Raphan v. United States · Zerman v. Melton · United States v. Gagnon · Evans v. United States · United States v. Washington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he trial judge did not purposefully exclude [Cohen] from the selection proceedings and ... could reasonably conclude that if [Cohen] was being deprived of any right, either he or his counsel would have said so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cohen v. Senkowski“[defendant] waived his Sixth Amendment right to observe the individual voir dire by failing to assert that right”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. WA
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.