Faulder v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
81 F.3d 515 · 1996
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 5 district · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 89 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably United States of America v. Chucks Emuegbunam (2001), United States v. Nai Fook Li (2000)
22 federal appellate · 5 district · 17 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Giglio v. United States · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · Rideout v. United States · United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A state denies a criminal defendant due process when it knowingly uses perjured testimony at trial or allows untrue testimony to go uncorrected.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“that (1) the testimony was actually false, (2) the state knew it was false and (3) the testimony was material.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Hill's prior relationship with the district attorney's office, the frequent communication between counsel and clear understanding of the district attorney's final decision-making authority,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jordan v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.