United States v. Placente’s Empirical Analysis
81 F.3d 555 · 1996
Citation profile
14 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently May 2018
14 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Cuyler v. Sullivan · United States v. Frady · Wood v. Georgia · Swansboro Country, Inc. v. Lumberman's Mortgage Co. · Oklahoma v. New Mexico
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“counsel's introduction of probative evidence or plausible arguments that would significantly benefit one defendant would damage the defense of another defendant whom the same counsel is representing”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A defendant is entitled to an attorney who can make a decision to use or not to use testimony unfettered by the effect of that decision on his other client's case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.