Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 81 F.3d 808 - Wang v. Reno

Wang v. Reno’s Empirical Analysis

81 F.3d 808 · 1996

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
May 2019
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Magana-Pizano v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1998), Sun v. Ashcroft (2004)

18 federal appellate · 5 district ·

230199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Rochin v. People of California · Joshua Deshaney, a Minor, by His Guardian Ad Litem, and Melody Deshaney,s v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, et al. · Weinberger v. Salfi · Plyler v. Doe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While the State may have been aware of the dangers that Joshua faced in the free world, it played no part in their creation, nor did it do anything to render him any more vulnerable to them. That the State once took temporary custody of Joshua does not alter the analysis, for when it returned him to his father’s custody, it placed him in no worse position than that in which he would have been had it not acted at-all....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'when the State takes a person into its custody and holds him there against his will, the Constitution imposes some responsibility for [that person's] safety and general well-being.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[no person] shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.