Bartlett v. Baasiri’s Empirical Analysis
2023
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2333 (Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act of 2019) · 22 U.S.C. § 288 (International Organizations Immunities Act) · 22 U.S.C. § 288A · 22 U.S.C. § 288D · 28 U.S.C. § 1330 (§ 2 of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976) · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1603 (§ 4 of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976) · 28 U.S.C. § 1604 (§ 4 of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976)
Relies on Verlinden B. v. v. Central Bank of Nigeria · Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp. · Saudi Arabia v. Nelson · Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba · Republic of Austria v. Altmann
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.