Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

81 F. App'x 460

Lineberger v. York

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided November 25, 2003

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2003-11-25

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2008

1 state decisions

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Miller-El v. Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-11-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

¶3Jeffrey Bernard Lineberger seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lineberger has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1039, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4DISMISSED

/81/fappx/460 · .json · Public domain