Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

81 F. App'x 795

Goho v. Ashcroft

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided December 3, 2003

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2003-12-03

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2013

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Doherty

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-12-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Pierre Antoine Goho, a native and citizen of the Ivory Coast, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Goho’s motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2003); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Goho, No. A70-795-700 (B.I.A. Apr. 2, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2PETITION DENIED

/81/fappx/795 · .json · Public domain