81 F. Supp. 2d 217 - Lesley v. Chie’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 794
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Southeastern Community College v. Davis · Bragdon v. Abbott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]here is no medical basis for a licensed practitioner of obstetrics to refer an HIV-positive pregnant woman to a high risk clinic . . . based on HIV-positive status alone.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“specialized knowledge beyond that possessed by a licensed practitioner of obstetrics.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“solely by reason of her . . . disability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.