Briarpatch Ltd., LP v. Pate’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1338 · 28 U.S.C. § 1446 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 9 U.S.C. § 3
Relies on T. B. Harms Company v. Edward Eliscu and Ross Jungnickel, Inc. · Brackett v. . Griswold · Alexander & Alexander of New York, Inc. v. Fritzen · Pampillonia v. RJR Nabisco, Inc. · Scott v. Prudential Securities, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If after removal the plaintiff seeks to join additional defendants whose joinder would destroy subject matter jurisdiction, the court may deny joinder, or permit joinder and remand the action to the State court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.