81 F. Supp. 2d 666 - RTC v. Barton’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1821
Relies on 605 So. 2d 1032 - Roberts v. Benoit · 699 So. 2d 35 - Todd v. STATE, THROUGH DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES · Landmark Land Company v. Resolution Trust Corporation · Federal Deposit Insurance v. Barton · Landmark Land Co. of Carolina v. Resolution Trust Corp. (In Re Landmark Land Co. of Oklahoma)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“but for the wrongful bankruptcies (if they were in fact wrongful), the same amount would have been recovered, and the $13,000,000 or some portion of it would not have been expended”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The problem is, we do not know, nor can we ever know, what would have been recovered, and what it would have cost to do so, through [a] FIRREA administration”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“bankruptcy was a less desirable regime financially than FIRREA administration, in terms of what it cost and what it recovered”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.