State v. Ewing’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
1 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2015
1 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Grayned v. City of Rockford · Grayned v. City of Rockford · California State Board of Equalization v. Western Marina Corp. · 4 Cal. 4th 893 - Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Los Angeles · Richardson v. City and County of Honolulu
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'It is, therefore, the intent of this ordinance to strike an appropriate balance between the right of individuals to obtain information and derive pleasure by listening to radios and other devices, and the right of the public to a peaceful and healthful environment. It is not the intent of this legislation to interfere unduly with freedom of speech or religion by regulating the initial production or amplification of sound. Thus, the direct amplification of the human voice or music through the use of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“power to enact ordinances deemed necessary to protect health, life, and property, and to preserve the order and security of the county and its inhabitants on any subject or matter not inconsistent with, or tending to defeat, the intent of any state statute, provided also that the statute does not disclose an express or implied intent that the statute shall be exclusive or uniform throughout the State.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. BEREDAY“does not regulate the content of the sound from the reproducing device.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. MOYSA v. Davies
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.