Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 81 Ill. App. 3d 314 - In Re Devine

81 Ill. App. 3d 314 - In Re Devine’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently October 2023 · most notably 85 Ill. App. 3d 229 - People v. Edmonds (1980), People v. P.O. (2000)

30 state decisions

16019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 30 Ill. App. 3d 906 - People v. Taylor · People ex rel. Department of Children & Family Services v. Tolbert · 62 Ill. App. 3d 927 - In Re Tolbert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Appellants err in concluding that only a parent who is at fault may be found unfit. We assume that by `at fault' appellants mean to imply the imposition of blame because the actor knew or should have known the consequences of his act or omission. In the grounds of unfitness set forth in subsection D of section 1 of the Adoption Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 40, par. 1501D) nowhere appear such words as `wilful,' `intentional,' `knowingly,' `negligently' or any other word relating to the state of mind or will of the unfit person. * * * Thus a parent can be unfit without fault. * * * A child is no less exposed to danger, no less dirty or hungry because his parent is unable rather than unwilling to give him care." 81 Ill. App.3d 314 , 319-20, 401 N.E.2d 616 , 620-21.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.