Okoli v. Okoli’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
2 district · 10 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1186A (§ 216 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Dwyer v. Globe Newspaper Co. · Fortune v. National Cash Register Co. · Agis v. Howard Johnson Co. · Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Factual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level ... [based] on the assumption that all the allegations in the complaint are true ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“To survive a rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, a complaint must make 'factual allegations plausibly suggesting (not merely consistent with) an entitlement to relief.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.