Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 81 Md. App. 210 - Chambers v. State

81 Md. App. 210 - Chambers v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 2010
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Neil v. Biggers · Wilhelm v. State · Johnson v. State · Varney v. Lucerne-In-Maine Village Corp. · Attorney Grievance Commission v. Tyrrell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court. Ordinarily, the exercise of that discretion will not be disturbed upon appeal absent a showing of prejudice to the accused. In order to warrant a mistrial, the prejudice to the accused must be real and substantial; a mistrial should never be declared for light or transitory reasons."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.