81 Md. App. 403 - McCallum v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
6 district · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently October 2012 · most notably State v. McCallum (1991), Garnett v. State (1993)
6 district · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Morissette v. United States · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Liparota v. United States · State v. Faulkner · Dawkins v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(c) Suspended licenses generally. — A person may not drive a motor vehicle on any highway or on any property specified in § 21-101.1 of this article while the person’s license or privilege to drive is suspended in this State. (d) Revoked licenses. — A person may not drive a motor vehicle on any highway or on any property specified in § 21.101.1 of this article while the person’s license or privilege to drive is revoked in this State.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Trial judges are required, upon the request of any party, to instruct the jury as to the applicable law and to give a requested instruction which correctly states the law if it has not been fairly covered in the instructions actually given.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"Ordinarily one is not guilty of a crime unless he is aware of the existence of all those facts which make his conduct criminal. That awareness is all that is meant by the mens rea, the `criminal intent,' necessary to guilt, as distinct from the additional specific intent required in certain instances ... and even this general intent is not always necessary."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McCallum
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.