Antcliff v. June’s Empirical Analysis
1890
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably Hoppe v. Klapperich (1947), Crawford v. Euclid National Bank (1985)
1 federal appellate · 30 state decisions — followed in 16 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hamilton v. Smith · Brand v. Hinchman · Allen v. Codman · McPherson v. Runyon · Sweet v. Negus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““For every malicious wrong there is certainly in this day and age a remedy; and, under our liberal system of pleading in this State, a plain and clear statement of the facts constituting the wrong is sufficient, and it is but little matter, in actions of trespass on the case, what the action is named or called.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McDonald v. Hall
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.