Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 81 MO 610 - Heard v. Sack

Heard v. Sack’s Empirical Analysis

1884

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
December 1948
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 1948

14 state decisions

501884189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vogler v. Montgomery · In re Toney · Hardin v. Lee · Reeve v. Kennedy · Freeman v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the infant may avoid a judgment against him, when his infancy was not disclosed, reason and justice would apply the rule with equal force to a lunatic.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.