Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 81 N.C. App. 617 - Stegall v. Robinson

81 N.C. App. 617 - Stegall v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2017

14 state decisions

701986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kidd v. Early · Finley v. Glenn Et Ux. · Hege v. Sellers · Reed v. Elmore · Hill v. Pinelawn Memorial Park, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “all duly recorded documents that a proper examination of the title would reveal.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “single reliable means for purchasers to determine the state of the title to real estate,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The controlling factor ... is that the immediate grantors of both plaintiff and defendants were the same. When the latter came to examine the title which was tendered to them, it was of primary consequence that they should know whether their grantors held title to the land which they were to convey. They could determine that question only by searching the records for grants from them. . . . ‘The weight of authority is to the effect that if a deed or a contract for the conveyance of one parcel of land, with a covenant or easement affecting another parcel of land owned by the same grantor, is duly recorded, the record is constructive notice to a subsequent purchaser of the latter parcel. The rule is based generally upon the principle that a grantee is chargeable with notice of everything affecting his title which could be discovered by an examination of the records of the deeds or other muniments of title of his grantor.’ (Citations omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.