Flint v. Chaloupka’s Empirical Analysis
1908
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 1940
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Flint v. Chaloupka · Seager v. Armstrong · Kohout v. Chaloupka · St. Paul Title & Trust Co. v. Sabin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There is another very potent reason why his application should have been denied. The petition of intervention does not allege that the trustee has not sufficient assets of the estate in his hands to pay the claims allowed and all other liabilities of the' estate.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mulroney v. McIntyre
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.