Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 81 Nev. 25 - Bean v. State

Bean v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

94
cited by 94 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
15
states following
April 2021
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 6 district · 77 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 94 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2021 · most notably Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera (1966), Petrocelli v. State (1985)

6 federal appellate · 6 district · 77 state decisions — followed in 15 states

4001965197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Escobedo v. Illinois · Massiah v. United States · Malloy v. Hogan · Sanders v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Here it is true that the investigation had begun to focus upon Bean; that he had been taken into police custody; that the police were about to commence a process of interrogation to elicit incriminating statements, and did so; that Bean was not warned of his absolute constitutional right to remain silent. However, Bean did not request counsel, nor was he denied the assistance of counsel. Absent such a request, and denial of counsel, the rule of Escobedo does, not apply. * * * * * * “In Morford v. State, 80 Nev.-, 395 P.2d 861 , we discussed the Dorado case, pointing out that it is an extension of the rule announced in Escobedo, and chose not to follow it.” 398 P.2d at 254 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the sort of person who carries deadly weapons.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.