Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

81 N.H. 418

128 A 335

State v. Giles

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 6, 1925

Supreme Court of New Hampshire · decided 1925-01-06

Relies on State v. Gerry · Marston v. Jenness · Farnam v. Davis

Decided 1925-01-06

Snow, J.

¶1 The rules of civil proceedings are applicable to complaints under P. S., c. 87. Marston v. Jenness, 11 N. H. 156, 161; Little v. Dickinson, 29 N. H. 56, 61; Stokes v. Sanborn, 45 N. H. 274, 276; Richmond v. Bowen, 54 N. H. 99, 101; Ford v. Smith, 62 N. H. 419.

¶2 “Either party may appeal from the judgment of a justice, in a civil cause, to the next trial term of the supreme [superior] court.” “No such appeal shall be allowed unless claimed within two hours after the judgment is rendered, nor unless the party appealing, within twenty-four hours, enters into recognizance, or files with the justice a bond to the adverse party, with sufficient sureties, in the sum of one hundred dollars, to pay the costs which may be recovered against him.” P. S., c. 210, ss. 7, 8. This statute is conclusive of the complainant’s rights. As she failed to enter into a recognizance, or file a bond, the municipal court had no power to grant her appeal. Gilman v. Bartlett, 20 N. H. 168; Farnam v. Davis, 32 N. H. 302, 309; Dickey v. Livermore, 34 N. H. 199, 201; State v. White, 41 N. H. 194, 196. “An appeal from a subordinate tribunal’s determination of fact is unknown to the common law. It exists only by statute. . . . The court cannot allow an appeal where none is provided, nor can it dispense with any of the prescribed conditions of an appeal that is provided. When the legislature declares that before an appeal is granted the appellant shall enter into a recognizance, the court cannot say that it shall be granted without a recognizance.” State v. Gerry, 68 N. H. 495, 502.

¶3 Exception overruled.

All concurred.
/81/nh/418 · .json · Public domain