Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 81 N.M. 450 - State v. Turner

State v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
March 1985
most recently cited

26 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Escobedo v. Illinois · State v. Roy · State v. Lord · Elsea v. Broome Furniture Co. · State v. Lott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The jury, in determining the weight to be given the expert opinions, was entitled to know the facts upon which the opinions were based, including all facts of a pertinent nature which were before the experts and which they could have considered in arriving at their conclusions. “In testing the expert opinion, the cross-examiner may ascertain whether all facts presented to the expert, although of a collateral nature, were considered by him. (Citations omitted), “In our opinion, the procedure followed in securing expert testimony as to the truthfulness of defendant’s denials opened the door to the question relating to the collateral crimes.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.