State v. Zarafonetis’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
60 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently December 2011 · most notably State v. Sparks (1985), State v. Romero (1975)
60 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Lindsey · Tackett v. State · State v. Hinojos · Hamilton v. Doty · State v. Slade
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We have uniformly held that an objection to the introduction of evidence which does not specify the particular ground on which the evidence is objectionable does not call the trial court’s attention to the matter to-be decided, and on appeal will be treated as if no objection to such evidence had been made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[g]uilty knowledge is rarely susceptible of direct and positive proof and generally can be established only through circumstantial evidence....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hermosillo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.