Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 81 N.M. 766 - Perry v. Staver

Perry v. Staver’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
2
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently March 2021 · most notably City of Albuquerque v. Ackerman (1971), Trujillo v. Romero (1971)

39 state decisions

170197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc. · De Sollar v. Hanscome · Barnett v. Cal M, Inc. · Paulos v. Janetakos · Kilkenny v. Kenney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To make a matter res judicata there must be a concurrence of the four conditions following, viz.: First, identity of the subject-matter; second, identity of cause of action; third, identity of persons and parties; and, fourth, identity in the quality of the persons for or against whom claim is made.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “is not only a limitation on the remedy but also on the right to institute such an action.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “None of the preceding provisions of this chapter shall apply to any action or suit, which by any particular statute of this state, is limited to be commenced within a different time, nor shall this chapter be construed to repeal any existing statute of the state which provides a limitation of any action; but in such cases the limitation shall be as provided by such statutes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.