Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 81 Ohio App. 375 - Hill v. Skinner

81 Ohio App. 375 - Hill v. Skinner’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
9
states following
October 1991
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently October 1991 · most notably State v. Duncan (1978), State v. Wallace (1988)

3 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

100194719501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The essential test of the competency of an infant witness is his comprehension of the obligation to tell the truth and his intellectual capacity of observation, recollection and communication. The nature of his conception of the obligation to tell the truth is of little importance if he shows that he will fulfill the obligation to speak truthfully as a duty which he owes a Diety or something held in reverence or regard, and if he has the intellectual capacity to communicate his observations and experiences.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Every person is competent to be a witness except: “(A) Those of unsound mind, and children under ten (10) years of age, who appear incapable of receiving just impressions of the facts and transactions respecting which they are examined, or of relating them truly * * *.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “answer to a question propounded after the intervention of circumstances which would make the reply one lacking the attributes of spontaneity,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.