81 Ohio App. 3d 654 - State v. Penrod’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently September 2019
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chicago Co v. City of Chicago · Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. Beckwith · State v. Lilliock · State v. Casalicchio · Pritz v. Messer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an action in personam is done, or directed against, a specific person such that a judgment in personam seeks recovery from one's personal liability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. LUNSFORD v. LUNSFORD
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.